JUDGMENT

S.K. Sahoo, J. - The petitioners Sushant Kumar Meher and Subransu Sekhar Meher have filed Crl. Rev. No.1093 of 2006 challenging the order dated 30.08.2006 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bolangir (hereafter 'trial Court') in Sessions Case No. 88- B of 2005 in rejecting the petition filed by them under section 227 of Cr.P.C. for their discharge from the offences under sections 302 and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner Dushila Meher has filed Crl. Rev. No. 20 of 2016 challenging the order dated 15.12.2015 passed by the learned trial Court in Sessions Case No. 54-B of 2006 in framing charges against her for the offences under sections 498- A, 304-B, 302, 201 and 202 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Since both the revision petitions arise out of one case and common questions of fact and law are involved, with the consent of the learned counsel for both the parties, those were heard analogously and disposed of by this common judgment.

The learned trial Court has rejected the discharge petition of the petitioners in Crl. Rev. No. 1093 of 2006 as per impugned order dated 30.08.2006 on the ground that charges