SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 630

S. MURALIDHAR, C. R. DASH
State of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Benu Behera – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. J. Katikia, Additional Government Advocate, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - This appeal by the State of Orissa is against a judgment and order dated 16th January 1991 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Puri (hereafter, "the trial court") acquitting the accused persons i.e., Respondent Nos.1 to 28 of the charges under Sections 302/149 IPC and 302/149/148 IPC in Sessions Trial No.9/61 of 1990.

2. It requires to be mentioned at the outset that during the pendency of the present appeal, Accused No.1 (A1) Benu Behera, A3-Sankar Behera, A8-Bihari Palei, A10-Gatiswar Lenka, A11-Jogi Lenka, A18-Bidyadhar Pradhan and A20-Narayan Pradhan have expired. It must also be noted that leave was granted to the State to appeal against the impugned judgment and order of the trial court by this Court by an order 22nd April, 1991. By orders dated 18th June and 26th June 1991, the Respondents were directed to be released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.2000/- each with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

3. From time to time, this Court has adjourned the case and on 26th February 2021, the Registry was asked to obtain instructions from the Superintendent of Police (SP), Puri and the Inspector-I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top