S. MURALIDHAR, R. K. PATTANAIK
Amit @ Gullu @ Amitav Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. These four appeals are directed against the judgment dated 20th September, 2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court-II), Bhadrak in Sessions Trial No.91/66 of 2007-09 convicting the Appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 396 & 397 IPC and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act and sentencing them as under:
I. to undergo imprisonment for life each and a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default to undergo further six months rigorous imprisonment (RI) each for the offence under Section 396 IPC;
II. to undergo RI for ten years each and fine of Rs.1000/- and in default to undergo further RI for six months each for the offence under Section 395 IPC;
III. to undergo RI for seven years each for the offence under Section 397 IPC;
IV. to undergo RI for three years each and fine of Rs.500/- and in default to undergo RI for three months each for the offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act;
V. to undergo RI for three years each and fine of Rs.500/- and in default to undergo RI for three months each for the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act; all the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. At the outset, it must be mentioned that seventeen persons
Budhsen vs. State of U.P. AIR 1970 SC 1321
Manipur Administration vs. Thokchom Bira AIR 1965 SC 87
Om Prakash vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1998 SC 1220
Rahimal vs. State of UP (1992) CrLJ 3819
Raja vs. State by the Inspector of Police (2020) 15 SCC 562
Sampat Tatyada Shinde vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 1974 SC 791
Sheikh Hasib @ Tabarak vs. State of Bihar AIR 1972 SC 283
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.