IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S. Muralidhar, M.S.Raman, JJ.
Paras Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
STREV No. 42 of 2021
Decided On : 30-01-2023
Acceptance of Returned Filed by Self-Assessment - Communication Failure - The court set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal and corresponding orders due to the failure of the department to communicate the acceptance of the returned filed by self-assessment to the Petitioner-Assessee. The judgment of the court in M/s. Keshab Automobiles v. State of Odisha and subsequent orders affirmed by the Supreme Court influenced the decision in favor of the Assessee.
Fact of the Case:
The acceptance of the returned filed by way of self-assessment was not communicated to the Petitioner-Assessee by the Department.
Finding of the Court:
The court found in favor of the Assessee due to the failure of the department to communicate the acceptance of the returned filed by self-assessment. The impugned order of the Tribunal and corresponding orders were set aside.
Issues: Communication failure regarding acceptance of self-assessment return
Ratio Decidendi: Failure to communicate acceptance of self-assessment return led to setting aside of the impugned orders.
Final Decision: The impugned order of the Tribunal and the corresponding orders are set aside. The revision petition is disposed of in favor of the Assessee.
JUDGMENT
1. Admit. The following question is framed for consideration:
' Whether in view of the judgment of this Court in M/s. Keshab Automobiles v. State of Odisha (Judgment dated 1st December, 2021 in STREV No. 64 of 2016), the impugned order of the Tribunal and the corresponding orders of the First Appellate Authority and the Assessing Authority is required to be set aside ?'
2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is obvious that acceptance of the returned filed by way of self- assessment was not communicated to the Petitioner-Assessee by the Department. In that view of the matter, in view of the judgment of this Court dated 1st December, 2021 read with a subsequent order dated 8th April, 2022 in STREV No.64 of 2016 (M/s. Keshab Automobiles v. State of Odisha), which has been affirmed by the Supreme Court of India in Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax v. M/s. Rathi Steel and Power Limited by order dated 13th July, 2022 in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.9912 of 2022, the question is answered in the affirmative i.e., in favour of the Assessee and against the Department.
3. Consequently, the impugned order of the Tribunal and the corresponding orders are set aside. The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Failure to communicate acceptance of self-assessment return can lead to setting aside of the impugned orders.
Reassessment proceedings without prior assessment are not justified under the relevant provisions of the Act.
Assessment orders under the OVAT Act must adhere to principles of natural justice, including providing an opportunity for a hearing; reliance on non-existent documents renders the assessment invalid.
The uncontroverted averments and established legal position can lead to setting aside an assessment order and quashing consequential demands.
An assessing authority is bound by the specific findings and directions issued by an appellate authority in a remand order; failure to adhere to these directions renders the resulting assessment orde....
Judicial review under Article 226 allows for remanding cases for fresh consideration if procedural fairness was compromised.
In the exercise of writ jurisdiction, the court may set aside an ex-parte assessment order passed due to the assessee's non-participation, provided the assessee is willing to undergo a conditional re....
Court remands ex parte GST assessment for fresh consideration on equitable grounds, subject to 25% disputed tax deposit, allowing assessee fresh opportunity despite prior non-participation.
When an ex parte assessment order is passed, the court may set aside the order and remand the matter to the assessing authority to ensure the principles of natural justice are upheld by granting the ....
A reassessment under Section 43 of the OVAT Act requires the STO to form an independent opinion on whether there was escapement of taxable turnover, and cannot simply accept the objection of the audi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.