SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 95

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S. Muralidhar, M.S.Raman, JJ.
Paras Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
STREV No. 42 of 2021
Decided On : 30-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
S.K. Mishra, Advocate, Iswar Mohanty, Advocate

Failure to communicate acceptance of self-assessment return can lead to setting aside of the impugned orders.

Headnote:

Acceptance of Returned Filed by Self-Assessment - Communication Failure - The court set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal and corresponding orders due to the failure of the department to communicate the acceptance of the returned filed by self-assessment to the Petitioner-Assessee. The judgment of the court in M/s. Keshab Automobiles v. State of Odisha and subsequent orders affirmed by the Supreme Court influenced the decision in favor of the Assessee.

Fact of the Case:

The acceptance of the returned filed by way of self-assessment was not communicated to the Petitioner-Assessee by the Department.

Finding of the Court:

The court found in favor of the Assessee due to the failure of the department to communicate the acceptance of the returned filed by self-assessment. The impugned order of the Tribunal and corresponding orders were set aside.

Issues: Communication failure regarding acceptance of self-assessment return

Ratio Decidendi: Failure to communicate acceptance of self-assessment return led to setting aside of the impugned orders.

Final Decision: The impugned order of the Tribunal and the corresponding orders are set aside. The revision petition is disposed of in favor of the Assessee.

JUDGMENT

1. Admit. The following question is framed for consideration:

    ' Whether in view of the judgment of this Court in M/s. Keshab Automobiles v. State of Odisha (Judgment dated 1st December, 2021 in STREV No. 64 of 2016), the impugned order of the Tribunal and the corresponding orders of the First Appellate Authority and the Assessing Authority is required to be set aside ?'

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is obvious that acceptance of the returned filed by way of self- assessment was not communicated to the Petitioner-Assessee by the Department. In that view of the matter, in view of the judgment of this Court dated 1st December, 2021 read with a subsequent order dated 8th April, 2022 in STREV No.64 of 2016 (M/s. Keshab Automobiles v. State of Odisha), which has been affirmed by the Supreme Court of India in Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax v. M/s. Rathi Steel and Power Limited by order dated 13th July, 2022 in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.9912 of 2022, the question is answered in the affirmative i.e., in favour of the Assessee and against the Department.

3. Consequently, the impugned order of the Tribunal and the corresponding orders are set aside. The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top