Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S. Muralidhar, M.S.Raman, JJ.
M/s. Lohiya Motors (p) Ltd., Berhampur – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
STREV No. 24 of 2014
Decided On : 17-01-2023
Reassessment Proceedings - Taxation Law - The court held that the reassessment proceeding initiated and completed without any prior assessment is not justified under the relevant provisions of the Act, based on the precedent set by a previous decision.
Fact of the Case:
The court considered the justification of maintaining the reassessment proceeding under the relevant provisions of the Act without prior assessment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the reassessment proceeding was not justified and set aside the impugned orders of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the First Appellate Authority, and the Assessing Authority.
Issues: The main issue was whether the reassessment proceeding was justified under the Act without prior assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on a previous decision to conclude that the reassessment proceeding was not justified under the relevant provisions of the Act.
Final Decision: The revision petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner/Assessee, setting aside the impugned orders of the lower authorities.
JUDGMENT
1. Heard.
2. Admit.
3. The following question of law is framed for consideration by this Court:
'(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in maintaining the reassessment proceeding U/s.43 of the Act which has been initiated and completed without any prior assessment U/s.39, 40 and 42 of the Act?'
4. The above question is no longer res integra and stands covered by the decision dated 1st December, 2021 of this Court in STREV No.64 of 2016 (M/s. Keshab Automobiles v. State of Odisha) which was affirmed by the order dated 13th July, 2022 of the Supreme Court of India in SLP(C) No.9912 of 2022 (Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax v. M/s. Rathi Steel and Power Ltd.).
5. In that view of the matter, the question framed is answered in the negative, i.e., in favour of the Petitioner/Assessee and against the Department. The impugned order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and the corresponding orders of the First Appellate Authority and the Assessing Authority are hereby set aside.
6. The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Reassessment proceedings without prior assessment are not justified under the relevant provisions of the Act.
A reassessment under Section 43 of the OVAT Act requires the STO to form an independent opinion on whether there was escapement of taxable turnover, and cannot simply accept the objection of the audi....
The uncontroverted averments and established legal position can lead to setting aside an assessment order and quashing consequential demands.
The Tribunal must avoid unnecessary findings and adhere to binding judgments from higher courts during tax assessments and re-assessments.
Reassessment proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act can only be initiated for turnover escapement, and not for reversing input tax credit, which is treated as an allowance rather tha....
Assessing authorities can issue revised pre-assessment notices but must do so based on valid reasons to avoid arbitrariness.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
