SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 106

V. NARASINGH
Manu Duria – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M. Padhy, Advocate, P.K. Maharaj, Advocate

JUDGMENT

V. Narasingh, J. - Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is an accused in G.R. Case No.831 of 2021 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Semiliguda, arising out of Sunabeda P.S. Case No.160 of 2021, for commission of alleged offence under Sections 147/148/307/506/363/149 IPC.

3. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Koraput, by order dated 03.11.2023 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

4. Taking into account the nature of allegation and the role ascribed to the Petitioner and since the consideration by the learned Court in seisin over the matter was during the course of investigation, this Court is not inclined to entertain this bail application at this stage without having the assessment of materials on record by the learned Court in seisin.

5. It shall be open to the Petitioner to move the learned Court in seisin over the matter after filing of charge sheet and the same shall be considered on its own merits without being influenced by the earlier rejection or the order passed by this Court.

6. Accordingly, the BLAPL sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top