SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1973

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.
The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax - Petitioner
Vs.
M/s Financial Software And Systems Private Ltd. - Respondent
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 11574 Of 2022
Decided On : 22-07-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG, Mr. Divyanshi, Adv, Ms. Meera Kaur Patel Adv, Mr. Amit Sharma B, Adv, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 143 - Re-opening of assessment - High Court set aside reassessment proceedings, determining they were based on change of opinion and already addressed queries during the original assessment - Revenue could not re-open proceedings on the same grounds - Special Leave Petition dismissed. (Paras 1)

(B) Change of Opinion - The principle prohibits reassessment by Revenue on a matter already considered and resolved during the original assessment process.

Facts of the case:
The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax filed a petition challenging the decision of the High Court which set aside reassessment proceedings due to the same grounds being previously addressed under Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Findings of Court:
The High Court did not err in setting aside the re-opening of the assessment, as it was based on a change of opinion following specific queries raised and answered previously by the Assessee.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the Revenue was justified in re-opening the assessment after specific queries were answered during the original assessment under Section 143.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Revenue’s re-opening of the assessment constituted a change of opinion since the grounds for reassessment were previously examined, aligning with the principle that once an issue has been resolved, it should not be revisited by the same authority unless warranted by new evidence.

Result: Special Leave Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. reassessment set aside due to change of opinion (Para 1)
2. pending applications disposed of (Para 2)

ORDER :

1. The re-opening of the assessment has been set aside by the High Court by specifically observing that the reassessment proceedings were on change of opinion and after taking into consideration the fact that at the time of original assessment under Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, specific queries were raised which were answered by the Assessee and, therefore, thereafter it was not open for the Revenue to re-open the assessment proceedings on the same ground and thereafter when the re-assessment proceedings have been set aside, it cannot be said that the High Court has committed any error. The Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.

2. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top