SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 37

B. P. SATAPATHY
Upendra Kumar Jena – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J. - This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. This matter was originally heard and order was reserved on 14.10.2022. Subsequently for clarification on certain points the matter was again listed on 27.10.2022 under the heading 'to be mentioned' and the matter was heard further and the order was reserved.

3. Today when the matter was again listed under the heading 'to be mentioned', learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as the Private Opp. Party contended that the writ petition has been disposed of with passing of the order on 27.10.2022 and the same has been uploaded by the NIC Centre. This Court finds that no such order has been passed and delivered on 27.10.2022 and the same has been done wrongly by the Jr. Stenographer namely Snehanjali Parida.

4. Since no such order was passed or pronounced on 27.10.2022 and the order has been wrongly uploaded in the website, Registry is directed to withdraw the said order forthwith. Registrar Judicial is also directed to issue a caution to the Jr. Stenographer namely Snehanjali Parida to remain cautious in future.

5. Heard further argument from the learned couns

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top