SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 23

ARINDAM SINHA
Maa Saraswati Shg – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M. K. Mohanty, Advocate, A. K. Nanda, Advocate, J. Pal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Sinha, J. - Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client is a Self Help Group (SHG). There was requirement for supply of Chhatua and with reference to letter dated 17th July, 2018, issued by the Collector and oral order for wholesome inquiry into all units of Pattamundai ICDS, there was inspection and joint report dated 31st August, 2018 made by the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) and the Sub-Collector. He demonstrates from the report that his client was found to be a producing unit having infrastructure facilities available, facilitates available to address emergency as well as hygienic atmosphere. On such findings the CDPO and the Sub-Collector recommended his client. On the same inspection and by the same report it was found that private opposite party no.6, the SHG engaged, was found to not have a producing unit nor facilities available to address emergency nor hygienic atmosphere though infrastructure facilities were available. In the circumstances, view taken by the CDPO and the Sub-Collector in the report was 'not recommended'. He submits, the report was obtained by his client upon making query under Right to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top