SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 624

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Maa Saraswati SHG, Kendrapara – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : D.P. Nanda, S. Jena
For the Respondent: S.N. Patnaik

Table of Content
1. engagement process of self help groups (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's request for engagement and counterarguments (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments presented by both parties (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's evaluation of feasibility and compliance with criteria (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final order and directive for engagement reconsideration (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner is a Women’s Self Help Group operating in the district of Kendrapara and engaged in preparation and supply of Take Home Ration (THR) (Chhatua). An advertisement was issued by the DSWO, Kendrapara inviting applications from SHGs for preparation and supply of THR (Chhatua) to different Anganwadi Centers under the said ICDS Project. Several SHGs, including the petitioner submitted their applications. A joint enquiry was conducted by the Sub-Collector and the CDPO, wherein the petitioner group was found most suitable in terms of experience, infrastructure facilities, ability to meet emergencies, maintenance of hygienic atmosphere etc., and was recommended for engagement. However, for reasons not clearly spelt out, the DSWO, Kendrapara engaged another Self Help Group, named Madaneswar SHG for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top