SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 58

ARINDAM SINHA, M. S. SAHOO
Bharati Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumar Sahu – Respondent


Advocates:
Bibhu Prasad Mohanty, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Arindam Sinha, J.

The matrimonial appeal has been preferred by appellant-wife against judgment dated 2nd February, 2017 made by the family Court in the civil proceeding by petition of respondent-husband, dissolving the marriage and directing deposit of Rs.50,000/- in favour of the child in any nationalized bank through her mother, within two months.

2. The appeal was presented on reported delay of 24 days. There was attempt of service in respect of the application for condonation of delay and the appeal, on respondent-husband. Coordinate Bench had directed substituted service, which was duly complied with. Ultimately, by order dated 11th October, 2023 the delay was condoned and the appeal admitted.

Respondent-husband continues to go unrepresented.

3. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant-wife and submits, the family Court erred in finding his client had deserted respondent-husband, to dissolve the marriage on ground (i-b) in section 13(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. He points out from paragraph 6 in impugned judgment that the family Court had said, on perusal of the case record it appears that defendant-wife was ousted on 3rd May, 2011. The finding milit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top