ARINDAM SINHA, M. S. SAHOO
Bharati Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumar Sahu – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arindam Sinha, J.
The matrimonial appeal has been preferred by appellant-wife against judgment dated 2nd February, 2017 made by the family Court in the civil proceeding by petition of respondent-husband, dissolving the marriage and directing deposit of Rs.50,000/- in favour of the child in any nationalized bank through her mother, within two months.
2. The appeal was presented on reported delay of 24 days. There was attempt of service in respect of the application for condonation of delay and the appeal, on respondent-husband. Coordinate Bench had directed substituted service, which was duly complied with. Ultimately, by order dated 11th October, 2023 the delay was condoned and the appeal admitted.
Respondent-husband continues to go unrepresented.
3. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant-wife and submits, the family Court erred in finding his client had deserted respondent-husband, to dissolve the marriage on ground (i-b) in section 13(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. He points out from paragraph 6 in impugned judgment that the family Court had said, on perusal of the case record it appears that defendant-wife was ousted on 3rd May, 2011. The finding milit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.