ARINDAM SINHA, SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Subhransu Kumar Behera – Appellant
Versus
Mamina Behera – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arindam Sinha, J.—The appeal has been preferred against judgment dated 16th May, 2022 of the family Court refusing to dissolve the marriage as petitioned by appellant-husband. Facts of the case are, the marriage was solemnized on 3rd February, 2014. On 12th February, 2015 a son was born to the couple. On 7th February, 2016 respondent-wife left the matrimonial home. Mr. Parija, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant-husband and submits, he is urging the ground of desertion. The family Court erred in not appreciating there was desertion and therefore ground under section 13(1)(i-b) in Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 stood demonstrated for the marriage to be dissolved. Since February, 2016 there has been no husband-wife relationship for the parties to remain married. As such the marriage has irretrievably broken down and not granting divorce has perpetuated the cruelty. He relies on judgment dated 26th April, 2023 of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal no.2012 of 2013 (Shri Rakesh Raman v. Smt. Kavita), paragraph-18, reproduced below.
“18. We have a married couple before us who have barely stayed together as a couple for four years and who have now been living separately fo
Desertion is not the withdrawal from a place but from a state of things.
Irretrievable breakdown of marriage in conjunction with established desertion fulfills grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, despite absence of independent evidence of cruelty.
Divorce – Deserted spouse must prove that there is a factum of separation and there is an intention on part of deserting spouse to bring cohabitation to a permanent end – Every matrimonial dispute is....
An irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground for divorce under Sec. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the marriage cannot be dissolved solely based on the parties living separately fo....
The court established that mental cruelty and desertion were proven through unrefuted evidence, justifying the dissolution of marriage under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act requires clear evidence of intention to abandon the marriage, and unsubstantiated allegations do not suffice to counter claims of desertion.
The appeal court found the Family Court's dismissal of divorce due to cruelty and desertion to be perverse, establishing that the husband's behavior justified dissolution of marriage.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for specific and substantiated instances of cruelty and desertion to support claims under Section 13(1)(ia) (ib) of the Hindu Marri....
The court emphasized that allegations of cruelty and desertion must be substantiated with clear evidence, and unchallenged claims do not warrant dissolution of marriage.
The burden of proof lies heavily upon the petitioner to establish desertion without any reasons being assigned. Cogent and reliable evidence is required to prove desertion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.