SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 231

S. K. SAHOO
Hemangini Meher – Appellant
Versus
Sangita Naik – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Devashis Panda, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sonak Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.

3. This Criminal Appeal has been filed under section 14-A(2) of the S.C. & S.T. (PoA) Act read with section 482 of the Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 28.08.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, Kalahandi, Bhawanipatna in C.T. Case No.1064 of 2021 (Special Act) in rejecting the petition under section 205 of Cr.P.C. filed by the appellant Dr. Hemangini Meher dispensing with her personal appearance in the case.

4. The case was instituted on the basis of the written report presented by one Sangita Naik before the I.I.C., Bhawanipatna Town Police Station on 30.09.2021 and accordingly, the case under sections 294/341/323 of the I.P.C. was registered and on completion of investigation, charge sheet was submitted on 20.03.2022 against the appellant under sections 341/323 of the I.P.C. read with section 3(2)(va) of the S.C. & S.T. (PoA) Act.

5. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 30.09.2021 at about 9.00 a.m. when the informant had come from Th. Rampur along with one pregnant lady Khiramani Jhadia to the Dist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top