SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Girija Shankar Mohapatra – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sashikanta Mishra, J.
Both these writ applications involve same facts for which they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 30343 of 2020 has filed the writ application seeking the following relief:
'Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to quash the order dtd: 22.10.2020 and dtd: 06.11.2020 of the Opposite Party No.2 under Annexure- 10 and 11 respectively and direct the opposite parties not to interfere in the functioning of the present petitioner as Principal-in-charge of the College;
And further the Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the draft charge dtd: 25.08.2020 under Annexure-11-A as it is illegal without jurisdiction and authority;
And/ or pass any other writ/ writs, order/ orders/ direction/ directions in the fitness of the case.
And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray. '
3. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 633 of 2022 has filed the writ application seeking the following relief:
'Under the above circumstances, it is humbly prayed that the writ petition may be allowed;
And
(A) a writ of mandamus or an appropriat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.