SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 33

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Anit Kumar Chakravarty – Appellant
Versus
Arun Krishna Rao Hazara – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Himansu Sekhar Mishra, Advocate, for the Petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, CJ.

 The present criminal revision application has been filed under Section 397 of the Cr.P.C. The sole petitioner has put to challenge a judgment dated 12.08.1998 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sambalpur in Criminal Appeal No.87/28 of 1996-97 whereby he has confirmed a judgment dated 09.10.1996 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Jharsuguda in ICC Case No.54 of 1994 whereby the petitioner stood convicted of the offence punishable under Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 and sentenced to a fine of Rs.500/- and in default, simple imprisonment for a month. The petitioner was also directed by the trial Court to deliver the possession of the quarters of the Mahanadi Coal-fields Limited ('MCL' in short), which he was occupying wrongfully, to MCL within one month and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months, in exercise of power under Section 630 (2) of the said Act.

2. Before I take note of the brief facts and the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, I consider it apposite to place on record the entire order-sheet right from the date of admission of the present criminal revision application, which is as under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top