SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 8

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Jitendra Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
Pallabi Biswal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.K. Mishra
For the Respondents: P.C. Jena

Table of Content
1. transfer petitions and their grounds (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding convenience in transfer (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. request for additional information via affidavit (Para 11)
4. law on convenience of the wife in transfers (Para 12)
5. court's decision on transfer requests (Para 13)
6. conclusion and directives for compliance (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

1. TRP(C) No.11 of 2025 has been filed by the Petitioner-wife for transfer of C.P. No.207 of 2024, which has been filed by the Opposite Party-husband before the learned Judge, Family Court Baripada under Section 13(i)(ia) of HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 for divorce, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Balasore, whereas, TRPCRL No.15 of 2025 has been filed by the Petitioner-husband for transfer of D.V. Misc. Case No.214 of 2024, which has been filed by the Opposite Party-wife under Section 12 of the P.W.D.V. Act, 2005 in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Balasore, to the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Baripada. TRPCRL No.16 of 2025 has also been filed by the Petitioner-husband for transfer of proceeding in Cr.P. No.382 of 2024, which has been filed by the Opposite Party-wife

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top