SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Jyotirmayee Dash @ Patra – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Ranjan Patra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.C. Panda
For the Respondent: R.P. Mohapatra

Table of Content
1. transfer request and details of the parties. (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. opposition to transfer based on convenience. (Para 2 , 8 , 9)
3. legal considerations for transfer application. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 11)
4. granting the transfer petition. (Para 12)
5. implementation and directions post-transfer. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

1. This transfer petition has been preferred by the Petitioner-Wife for transfer of proceeding in C.P. Case No.262 of 2025, now pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Puri, on the grounds detailed in the transfer petition.

3. Since pleadings are complete, on consent of the learned Counsel for the Parties, the matter is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission.

5. Reiterating the grounds urged in the transfer petition, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits, the Petitioner-Wife is a deserted lady. After her desertion, she is staying with her parents at Puri with her minor daughter namely, Maheswari @ Munmun Patra, who is only 10 years old and is mentally immature from her childhood and is under treatment. As she is mentall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top