SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, J.
Jyotirmayee Dash @ Patra – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Ranjan Patra – Respondent
T.R.P. (C) No. 267 of 2025
Decided On : 05-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.C. Panda
For the Respondent: R.P. Mohapatra

The court established that the convenience of the wife is the foremost consideration in transferring matrimonial proceedings, supported by relevant socioeconomic factors.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure - Section 24 - Transfer of matrimonial proceedings - The wife's convenience is the paramount consideration for transfer requests - Economic soundness, social strata, and behavioral factors are crucial in such decisions. (Paras 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner-wife seeks transfer of her case from Family Court, Bhubaneswar to Family Court, Puri due to desertion and childcare responsibilities. The respondent-husband opposes the transfer, citing medical issues.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the transfer for the convenience of the wife and her minor daughter's welfare, instructing both cases to proceed simultaneously.

Issues: Whether the transfer to Puri is justified based on the convenience of the wife and the implications for both parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that in matrimonial disputes, the wife's convenience must guide transfer decisions, considering socioeconomic factors.

Result: Transfer petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. transfer request and details of the parties. (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. opposition to transfer based on convenience. (Para 2 , 8 , 9)
3. legal considerations for transfer application. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 11)
4. granting the transfer petition. (Para 12)
5. implementation and directions post-transfer. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

S.K. MISHRA, J.

1. This transfer petition has been preferred by the Petitioner-Wife for transfer of proceeding in C.P. Case No.262 of 2025, now pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Puri, on the grounds detailed in the transfer petition.

2. Opposite Party-Husband, on being noticed, has filed an objection opposing to such prayer for transfer.

3. Since pleadings are complete, on consent of the learned Counsel for the Parties, the matter is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission.

4. Heard learned Counsel for the Parties.

5. Reiterating the grounds urged in the transfer petition, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits, the Petitioner-Wife is a deserted lady. After her desertion, she is staying with her parents at Puri with her minor daughter namely, Maheswari @ Munmun Patra, who is only 10 years old and is mentally immature from her childhood and is under treatment. As she is mentally immature, currently she is studying in Class-UKG at Puri.

6. That apart, at present the parents of the Petitioner are looking after her and her minor daughter .However, they are not in a position to accompany her to attend the Court proceeding at Bhubaneswar. The distance from Puri to Bhubanewar is around 50 K.Ms. There is no male member to accompany her to travel such a long distance. That apart, it will be difficult on her part to attend the day to day proceeding at Bhubaneswar leaving her minor daughter at Puri.

7. Further, at her instance, Cr.P. No.26 of 2025 is now pending before the learned Judge, Family Court, Puri for maintenance. On being noticed, the Opposite Party-Husband has appeared and is participating in the said proceeding.

8. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner further submits, as per the settled position of law, so far as transfer of matrimonial disputes, the convenience of the wife is the paramount consideration. He further submits, since the Opposite Party-Husband is appearing before the learned Judge, Family Court, Puri and contesting Cr.P. No.26 of 2025, it would be convenient for both the parties, if the proceeding is transferred to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Puri.

9. Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party-Husband submits, he has objection to such prayer, as the Opposite Party has some medical issues, he would be unable to travel to Puri to attend the day to day proceeding in C.P. Case No.262 of 2025, if it is transferred to Puri. Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party-Husband further submits, if this Court is inclined to allow the prayer for transfer, the Opposite Party be permitted to appear through virtual mode.

10. Law is well settled that, while dealing with the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings, the Court has to examine various factors and the most important factor is convenience of wife.

11. At this juncture, it would be apt to deal with the Judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 1199 (N.C.V. Aishwarya Vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha), wherein it was held as follows:-

“9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top