IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K. SAHOO, CHITTARANJAN DASH, JJ.
Chandia @ Chandi Sethy - Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 248 of 1998
Decided On : 11-08-2025
“Neither a borrower nor a lender be. For loan doth oft lose both itself and friend and borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.”
1. This famous quote was spoken by the character Polonius, King Claudius' Chief Minister as he gives advice to his son Laertes, while he is leaving for University in Paris in Shakespeare's play Hamlet. This advice emphasises the potential negative consequences of both lending and borrowing money, particularly in the context of relationships.
The case in hand depicts a painful and distressing event of double murder committed in front of the relations on the village street just in connection with non-payment of paltry loan amount of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand only).
2. The appellants Chandia @ Chandi Sethy (A-1), Karunakar Sethy @ Nandu (A-2), Bulu Sethy (A-3), Premananda Sethy (A-4), Suratha Sethy (A-5) and Basanta Sethy (A-6) along with Bhramar Sethy, Dhruba Sethy and Kulamani Sethy preferred this criminal appeal, however during pendency of the appeal, Bhramar Sethy, Dhruba Sethy and Kulamani Sethy expired and accordingly, as per order dated 10.09.2024, the criminal appeal was directed to be abated in respect of those three appellants. Thus, this criminal appeal survives only in respect of appellants, namely, Chandia @ Chandi Sethy (A-1), Karunakar Sethy @ Nandu (A-2), Bulu Sethy (A-3), Premananda Sethy (A-4), Suratha Sethy (A-5) and Basanta Sethy (A-6).
3. In the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kendrapara (hereafter "trial Court") in Sessions Trial No.43/455 of 1996, the appellants, namely, Chandia @ Chandi Sethy (A-1), Karunakar Sethy @ Nandu (A-2), Bulu Sethy (A-3) and Basanta Sethy (A-6) were charged under sections 302/34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereafter, "I.P.C.") on the accusation that on 19.06.1996 at about 7.30 a.m. at village Indupur under Kendrapara police station, they attacked and assaulted Sankarsan Sethy (hereinafter "D-1") the son of the informant (P.W.7) and Babuli Sethy (hereinafter "D-2") by means of crowbar, spear, bhujali etc. who succumbed to the injuries at District Headquarters Hospital, Kendrapara. Similarly, the appellants, namely, Bhramar Sethy (Dead), Dhruba Sethy (Dead), Kulamani Sethy (Dead), Premananda Sethy (A-4) and Suratha Sethy (A-5) were charged under sections 302/149 of the I.P.C. on the accusation that on said date, time and place of occurrence, they caused the death of D-1 and D-2 by means of bhujali, spear, lathi etc.
The learned trial Court vide impugned judgment and order dated 22.09.1998 found the appellants, namely, A-1 Chandia @ Chandi Sethy, A-2 Karunakar Sethy @ Nandu, A-3 Bulu Sethy and A-6 Basanta Sethy guilty under section 302/34 of the I.P.C. and the appellants, namely, Bhramar Sethy (dead), Dhruba Sethy (dead), Kulamani Sethy (dead), A-4 Premananda Sethy and A-5 Suratha Sethy guilty under section 302/149 of the I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- (five thousand) each, in default, to undergo R.I. for six months.
Prosecution Case:
4. The prosecution case, as per the first information report (hereinafter "F.I.R.") (Ext.4) lodged by Brahmananda Sethy (P.W.7), the father of D-1 on 19.06.1996 at Kendrapara police station, in short, is that his youngest son (D-1) was maintaining his livelihood by catching and selling fish. About one and half year prior to the date of occurrence, D-1 had given a hand loan of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand) to A-2 Karunakar Sethy @ Nandu, who was his neighbour. In spite of several approaches to A-2, D-1 could not get back the loan amount. D-1 was taken into custody in connection with a rape case and lodged in Kendrapara Jail. While he was in jail custody, A-2 Karunakar Sethy @ Nandu who had borrowed money from D-1, paid Rs.200/- (rupees two hundred) to D-1 for his expenses. D-1 was released from jail fifteen to twenty days prior to the occurrence and he approached A-2 Karunakar Sethy @ Nandu for repayment of the lo
Krishna Govind Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra
Sunil Vs. State of NCT of Delhi
Dilawar Singh Vs. State of Delhi
Thulia Kali Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Dalip Singh v. State of Punjab
Md. Rojali Ali Vs. The State of Assam Ministry of Home Affairs through Secretary
Ganapathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Jayabalan Vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry
Dhanajaya Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Mast Ram
Ukha Kolhe Vs. The State of Maharashtra
AI
The conviction under Sections 302/34 and 302/149 IPC was upheld as the court found sufficient evidence of common intention and credible eye witness testimonies corroborated by medical evidence.
The appellants' conviction for murder was altered to culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to lack of intent, despite their involvement in the unlawful assembly and rioting.
The court determined that while the appellants participated in an unlawful assembly leading to death, their intent was not murder, qualifying the offense under culpable homicide not amounting to murd....
Point of law : Object of the proceedings under Section 174 Cr.P.C. is merely to ascertain whether a person died under suspicious circumstances or met with an unnatural death and, if so, what was its ....
Reliable eye-witness testimony of natural witnesses, consistent with medical evidence and prompt FIR, sustains murder conviction under 302/34 IPC despite alleged enmity.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code to establish the shared common intention of the accused in committing the murder.
Criminal Law – Offence of Murder – Testimony of eye-witnesses – Admissibility of - Testimony of eye-witnesses, we find that one Appellant 2 was identified as a member of the unlawful assembly who had....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.