Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C. BEHERA
Ramesh Chandra Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing background of plaintiffs' claim. (Para 4) |
| 2. defendants challenged plaintiffs' claims. (Para 5) |
| 3. issues framed by the trial court. (Para 6) |
| 4. trial court favors plaintiffs after evaluation. (Para 8) |
| 5. appellate court reverses trial court decision. (Para 10) |
| 6. determination of civil death requirement. (Para 12 , 19) |
| 7. dismissal of appeal confirmed. (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
A.C. BEHERA, J.
This 2nd appeal has been preferred against the reversing judgment.
2. The appellants in this 2nd appeal were the plaintiffs before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.15 of 1988 and respondent nos.1 and 2 before the 1st appellate court in the 1st appeal vide T.A. No.20 of 1989.
3. The respondents in this 2nd appeal were the defendant nos.1 and 2 before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.15 of 1988 and appellants before the 1st appellate court in the 1st appeal vide T.A. No.20 of 1989.
The respondent no.3 in this 2nd appeal was the defendant no.3 before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.15 of 1988 and the respondent no.3 before the 1st appellate court in the 1st appeal vide T.A.No.20 of 1989.
4. The case of the plaintiffs(appellants in this 2nd appeal) aga
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
