Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH, G.SATAPATHY
Santa Sabar @ Panda – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal challenging conviction. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual details of the crime. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. accused's plea and lack of evidence. (Para 6) |
| 4. arguments from both parties. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's analysis of evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. appeal dismissed; conviction upheld. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
The Appellant, by filing this Appeal from inside the jail, has called in question the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 6th March, 2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Paralakhemundi, Gajapati in S.T. No.60 of 2017 arising out of G.R. Case No.102 of 2012 corresponding to Rayagada P.S. Case No.13 of 2017 of the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (S.D.J.M.), Paralakhemundi.
2. Prosecution Case:-
3. In course of investigation, the Investigating Officer (I.O.- P.W.9) examined the Informant (P.W.1) and other witnesses and recorded their statements under section 161 of Cr.P.C. Having visited the spot, the I.O. (P.W.9) prepared the spot map (Ext.10). He (P.W.9) held the inquest over the dead body of the deceased and prepared the report (Ext.2) and sent the same for post mortem examination by issuing necessary requisition. He
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
