Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Chitta Ranjan Meher – Appellant
Versus
Soudamini Meher – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the plaintiffs' suit and defendant's counter-claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. issues framed for trial and trial court's initial decree. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. lower appellate court's analysis and findings. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal arguments presented by the appellants' counsel. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. validity and implications of the agreements in the case. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. discussion on part performance and possession rights. (Para 17 , 19) |
| 7. court's judgment and final order on appeals. (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
The Plaintiffs in C.S. No.6/2012 in the court of Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Boudh, are theappellants. In the present appeal, they seek to challenge the judgment dated 08.2.2018 passed by learned District Judge, Boudh, followed by decree in R.F.A No.22/2017 confirming thereby the judgment dated 19.5.2017 followed by decree passed by the Trial Court in the aforementioned suit.
3. For convenience, the parties are referred to as per their respective status in the trial Court.
The defendant entered appearance and contested the suit by filing written statement. She claimed that the full consideration amount was paid and she was in cultivating possession of the land,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
