SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 267

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
V. NARASINGH, J.
Bao Viet Insurance Corporaton - Appellant
Versus
MV World Virtue - Respondent
ADMLS No.7 of 2025
Decided On : 10-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.J. Biswal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Aditi Maheshwari, Advocate (D-1)

The court upheld the arrest of a vessel due to a prima facie maritime claim regarding cargo shortfall, emphasizing the necessity to protect the Plaintiff's rights without immediate security requirements.

Headnote:(A) Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 - Sections 4(1)(d)(f)(g)(h) and 11 - Application for arrest of vessel due to maritime claim arising out of shortfall of cargo - The Plaintiff established a prima facie case to maintain the suit and seek an arrest order - The Defendant failed to provide adequate counter-evidence regarding the survey report's authenticity - The court ruled in favor of arresting the Defendant vessel to prevent frustration of the Plaintiff's claim. (Paras 5, 8, 11, and 12)

Facts of the case:
The Plaintiff filed a suit seeking the arrest of the Defendant vessel for failing to deliver cargo as contracted, resulting in financial loss, and claimed damages through this lawsuit.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Plaintiff demonstrated a prima facie case for the arrest of the Defendant vessel and ruled that the arrest was justified without requiring the Plaintiff to furnish security at this stage.

Issues: The key issue was whether the Plaintiff had a prima facie case warranting the arrest of the vessel due to alleged cargo shortfall, and whether the Defendant could provide sufficient evidence to refute this claim.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for maintaining the Plaintiff's rights and ensuring timely resolution of maritime claims, concluding that the absence of security requirements was justified based on current circumstances.

Result: The Defendant vessel MV WORLD VIRTUE was ordered to be arrested.

Table of Content
1. court fees payment confirmation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. reliefs sought in admiralty suit. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments on prima facie case. (Para 8)
4. court's view on maintaining suit and cause of action. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. final order for vessel arrest and subsequent actions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

ORDER :

V. NARASINGH, J.

I.A No.35 of 2025

1. This is an application for payment of court fees.

2. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that in the meanwhile deficit court fees of Rs.23,150/- has already been paid. Memo filed to the said effect is taken on record.

3. In view of the same, no further order need be passed in this I.A seeking extension of time to file the deficit court fees.

4. I.A is accordingly disposed of.

5. Registry is called upon to number the ADMLS.

6. This Court is informed that the present ADMLS shall be numbered as ADMLS No.7 of 2025.

02. ADMLS No.7 of 2025 and I.A Nos.34 & 36 of 2025

1. This matter was mentioned yesterday by the learned counsel for the Plaintiff, Mr. Biswal. At the time of mentioning, it was submitted at the Bar that there is a caveat. Therefore, learned counsel for the Plaintiff was asked to serve a copy of the petition on the caveator.

2. Ms. Maheshwari, learned counsel submits that she has entered appearance on behalf of the Defendant-vessel by filing Caveat No.2 of 2025 which was filed in ADMLS No.6 of 2025 and the same may be adopted in the present case as per Regulation No.30 of the Orissa High Court Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Rules, 2020 [30. Caveat against arrest of property:-

(1) Any person desiring to prevent the arrest of any property shall file in the Registry a praecipe, signed by himself or his Advocate, who may be acting for him requesting that caveat be entered against the arrest of the said property and undertaking to enter an appearance in person or by a Vakalatnama in any suit that may be instituted against the said property and to give security in such suit in a sum not exceeding the amount to be stated in the praecipe or to pay such sum into the Registry. The caveat shall contain the name, address and e- mail address of the caveator and/or his advocate, as the case may be. A caveat against the issue of a warrant for the arrest of the said property shall thereupon be entered in a book to be kept in the Registry, called the “Caveat Warrant Book”. The Caveat Warrant Book shall state the amount of security that the caveator has undertaken to provide as per praecipe.

(2) Copy of plaint in suit against property to be served before filing plaint on the caveator-Any person instituting a suit against any property in respect of which a caveat has been entered in the “Caveat Warrant Book” shall, before filing the plaint, serve a copy thereof upon the party on whose behalf the caveat has been entered or upon his Advocate and annex to the plaint a statement of such service.

(3) Caveator to give security on filing of plaint-Within three days from the filing of the plaint, the party on whose behalf the caveat has been entered shall, if the sum in which the suit has been instituted does not exceed the amount for which he has given the undertaking, give security in such sum or pay the same into the Registry, or if exceeds that amount, give security to the sum in which the suit has been instituted or pay the same into the Registry.

(4) On default, the suit may proceed ex parte-After the expiration of three days from the filing of the plaint, if the party on whose behalf 'a caveat has been entered shall not have given security in such sum or paid the same into the Registry, the plaintiff may apply to the Registrar to set down the suit forthwith for hearing as an undefended, suit;

Provided that the Court may on good cause shown and on such terms as to payment of costs as it may impose, extend the time for giving security or paying the money into the Registry.

(5) Judgment on the claim and enforcement of Judgment on the claim payment-When t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top