Tejaswari Muduli vs Himanshu Sekhar Mohanty

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Ori) 640

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Tejaswari Muduli – Appellant
Versus
Himanshu Sekhar Mohanty – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.K. Pradhan Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. B. Sahoo Advocate

Table of Content
1. transfer petition details and mediation outcomes. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner's circumstances and travel difficulties. (Para 5)
3. opposing arguments and lack of documentary evidence. (Para 6)
4. legal standards for transfer in matrimonial cases. (Para 7 , 8)
5. decision to grant transfer and procedural directives. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
6. final administrative directives and conclusion. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

1. This transfer petition has been preferred by the Petitioner-Wife for transfer of proceeding in MAT Case No.52 of 2024 preferred by the Opposite Party-Husband under section 9 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955, now pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), Talcher, to the Court of learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Kuchinda in the district of Sambalpur, on the grounds detailed in the transfer petition.

3. Hence, on consent of the learned Counsel for the Parties, the transfer petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission, permitting the Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party-Husband to have his oral objections, if any, to the prayer made in the transfer petition.

5. Reiterating the grounds urged in the transfer