SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 376

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Ramesh Chandra Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : D.N. Rath
For the Respondent: C.K. Pradhan

Table of Content
1. court's hearing procedures and representation (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner’s request for mandate and pension (Para 3)
3. legality of ongoing departmental proceedings post-retirement (Para 4)
4. state's contention regarding previous instructions (Para 5)
5. court's consideration of the procedural impermissibility (Para 6)
6. final disposition of the writ petition (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:-

And this Hon’ble Court be further pleased to direct the opposite parties to release the pension and other retiral dues of the petitioner forthwith. since in the meantime more than two years have passed from the date of retirement of the petitioner and the petitioner has not yet received any pension and retiral dues in spite of the direction of this Hon’ble Court under Annexure-13 to the writ petition.

And for this act of kindness, as in duty bound, the petitioner shall ever pray.”

4.1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that even though instruction was provided to this Court that no proceeding is pending against the Pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top