SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY
Hrushikesh Rout – Appellant
Versus
Gagan Bihari Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.C. Panda
For the Respondent: R.K. Mohapatra

Table of Content
1. facts regarding the case and parties involved. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. criteria for granting temporary injunctions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. evaluation of land possession claims. (Para 8)
4. dismissal of the c.m.p. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. B.C. Panda, learned Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. A.K. Sarangi, learned Advocate for the Opposite Party.

3. Present Petitioner being the Plaintiff filed the suit with a prayer to declare the deed of partition dated 21.04.1999 as inoperative in respect of the suit land on the ground of fraud, as well as to set aside the sale deed made in favour of Defendant No.1.

5. Such development of facts regarding amendment of the OCH & PFL Act and the order of stay passed by this Court in the writ petition was not stated in the plaint and also not brought to the knowledge of the court by Defendant No.1 in his objection to the I.A. filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the C.P.C. Thus, the learned trial court in order dated 06.05.2017 gave certain findings with regard to possession of the parties in respect of the suit land ignorant with such development of facts. Of course, the cancellation of registered partition deed as prayed by the Plai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top