Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Manoj Kumar Behera – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. premature retirement must follow guidelines. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. justification for premature retirement in public interest. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's decision to quash retirement order. (Para 6) |
| 4. conclusion: petition disposed. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT :
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Ms. P. Rath, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner along with Ms. S. Prusty, learned counsel and Mr. C.K. Pradhan, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the Opp.
Parties.
3. The present writ petition has been filed inter alia challenging order dtd.11.08.2022 so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 under Annexure-11. Vide the said order Petitioner was given premature retirement in terms of the Rule 71(a) of the Orissa Service Code (in short Code).
4. It is the case of the Petitioner that Petitioner joined as a Building SI in the Police Department vide order dtd.16.02.1998 under Annexure- 1. Subsequently, Petitioner joined as an Asst. Engineer (Civil) in the Department of Water Resources on 01.06.2004 as reflected in Annexure-1.
4.1. It is contended that Petitioner while so continuing, was promoted to the rank of Asst. Executive Engineer vide order dt
Premature retirement recommendations must adhere to age limit guidelines; deviations lead to invalidation. Appropriate procedures under OCS (CCA) Rules should be followed for misconduct cases.
Premature retirement decisions must adhere to prescribed guidelines; non-compliance when an employee reaches a certain age renders the decision unsustainable.
Premature retirement must not substitute for disciplinary action and should be based on clear evidence of public interest, not unsupported allegations.
Premature retirement of a government employee must adhere to mandated procedures, requiring review prior to age limits and consideration of service record, highlighting the need for clear evidence ag....
Compulsory retirement must be executed by the appointing authority, following due legal procedures and cannot be imposed as a penalty without disciplinary proceedings.
Premature retirement must adhere to procedural guidelines, ensuring proper review of employee performance and status without overlooking established age thresholds and adverse record considerations.
The court held that compulsory retirement must be based on a comprehensive review of performance, not merely on pending allegations, ensuring due process is followed in such decisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
