IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
Dhaneswar Jena – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 21807 of 2020
Decided On : 23-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. backdrop and facts of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner and ops. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the legality of the case. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final legal reasoning leading to the dismissal. (Para 14) |
| 5. conclusion and order passed by the court. (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of the India, 1950 has been filed by the Petitioner for himself as well as a representative of the Hamlet Kantabania in village Bajrakote under Krushnaprasad Tahasil in the District of Puri praying for quashing the approval of B.C.P. Case No.1 of 2018 passed on dated 16.12.2019 (Annexure-3) by the Director, Land Records & Survey, Odisha (O.P. No.1) i.e. to the declaration of the Hamlet Nuagaon of village Bajrakote as a separate revenue village.
2. The case of the Petitioner is that, he (Petitioner) is a resident of Hamlet Kantabania of village Bajrakote under Krushnaprasad Tahasil in the District of Puri. The village Bajrakote was a revenue village consisting of three Hamlets i.e. Natabania, Kantabania and Nuagaon and the total area of village Bajrakote is Ac.1645.40 decimal.
The Hamlet Kantabania is a flourishing hamlet of village Bajrakote having its own Gochar land, cremation/burial ground and Government land for communal purposes and some communal lands thereof had/have also been using by the residents of the Hamlet Nuagaon, as, the Hamlet Nuagaon of village Bajrakote is adjacent to the Hamlet Kantabania under the revenue village Bajrakote.
On the basis of some political background, the residents of Hamlet Nuagaon made a representation to the Collector, Puri (O.P. No.2) for creation of their Hamlet Nuagaon as a separate revenue village keeping Kantabania, as a Hamlet of their proposed revenue village Nuagaon bifurcating the same from the main village Bajrakote. The said representation of the residents of Hamlet Nuagaon was forwarded by the Collector, Puri (O.P. No.2) to the Tahasildar, Krushnaprasad, Puri (O.P. No.3) for an enquiry and report. The Tahasildar, Krushnaprasad, Puri (O.P. No.3) on being influenced politically submitted a report behind the back of the villagers of Bajrakote as well as the residents of Kantabania in support of the application of the residents of Hamlet Nuagaon for declaration of that Hamlet Nuagaon as a separate revenue village without serving statutory notices on the residents of Bajrakote and Kantabania and without calling upon them to have their say through objections in compliance with Rule 61 (4) of the O.S. & S Rule, 1962. As such, there was no joint verification for creation of boundaries of the newly proposed village i.e. Nuagaon. On the basis of the enquiry report dated 24.07.2019 (Annexure-1) of the Tahasildar, Krushnaprasad, Puri (O.P. No.3), the Collector, Puri (O.P. No.2) as per its order dated 04.11.2019 (Annexure-2) sent his proposal to the Director, Land Records & Survey, Odisha (O.P. No.1) for declaration of Hamlet Nuagaon as a separate revenue village as per Rule 61 of O.S. & S Rules, 1962, which is highly illegal.
On the basis of the recommendations made by the Collector, Puri (O.P. No.2) on dated 04.11.2019 (Annexure-2), the Director, Land Records & Survey, Odisha (O.P. No.1) approved the proposal of the Collector, Puri (O.P. No.2) on dated 16.12.2019 (Annexure-3) in B.C.P. Record No.1 of 2018 and the O.P. No.1 sent the case record to the Collector, Puri (O.P. No.2) for taking follow up actions thereof, to which, the Collector, Puri (O.P. No.2) accepted as per Annexure-4.
When, the Petitioner along with other villagers of Bajrakote and Hamlet Kantabania came to know about the declaration of Hamlet Nuagaon of village Bajrakote as a separate revenue village as per order passed by the O.P. No.1 in B.C.P. Case No.1 of 2018 then, they protested against the same through representations vide Annexure-5 series before the Collector, Puri (O.P. No.2), which is s
AI
The declaration of Hamlet Nuagaon as a separate revenue village was upheld as compliant with legal requirements, affirming the principles of natural justice were not breached.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the compliance with the provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, particularly regarding the publication of draft notifications and con....
Section 7 of Act, 1993 is only with regard to effective consultation with Gram Panchayat. Meaning thereby that if Gram Panchayat is not agreeable with merger then it is for State Government to decide....
Rights of gram panchayat - There is no absolute right given to Gram Panchayat with regard to ownership of property and that vesting is only confined to direction, management and control and that too,....
The court established that khatedari rights must be respected and that revenue authorities must maintain accurate records without unjustified alterations.
The court affirmed that the trial court's decree granting bhumidhari rights was valid, and the Board of Revenue acted within its jurisdiction in upholding this decision.
The court emphasized the importance of proper exercise of revisional jurisdiction and the need for valid mutations in land disputes.
The court established that historical use and prior classification of land as a burial ground take precedence over later regulatory restrictions.
Only civil courts have jurisdiction to determine ownership and rights over land, while administrative authorities must adhere to the statutory framework, as established in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.