Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Manager, T.P. Hub, National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bishan Das – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the employment and injury specifics. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on behalf of the appellant regarding insurance policy. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. analysis of the findings regarding accident and employment nexus. (Para 5 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's rejection of insurance defense due to lack of evidence. (Para 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. clarifying insurer's liability under the law. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. dismissal of the appeal and upholding of the award. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
1. In the present appeal, the appellant seeks a direction from this Court to set aside the judgment/order dated 07.10.2024 passed by the Commissioner for Employee’s Compensation-cum-/Divisional Labour Commissioner, Jagatsinghpur in E.C. Case No.16 of 2022, and to exonerate the insurer from liability, contending that the policy was not in force at the time of the accident.
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
(ii) The impact caused multiple grievous injuries, including fractures in both legs, necessitating immediate hospitalization. The injured driver was initially taken to Midnapur Medical College & Hospital for emergency care, subsequently shifted to Rajveer Nursing Home, Bhadrak, then to SCB M
The insurer's attempt to contest liability on an unproven technical ground regarding policy coverage was rejected, affirming that established liability under the Employees’ Compensation Act must be h....
Insurance Company’s liability established for employee injuries during employment; appeals under Employees' Compensation Act are limited to substantial questions of law, not factual reassessment.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the deceased's murder arose in the course of employment, attracting the provisions of the Employee Compensation Act, and that the insurance....
The insurer is liable for compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act but not liable for penalty due to employer's personal fault.
An employer may be held vicariously liable when an employee operates a vehicle without a valid license, negating insurer liability in case of substantive policy breach.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the liability of an Insurance Company to indemnify the employer and pay compensation to a claimant under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923,....
The appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and findings of fact by the Commissioner are final unless shown to be perverse.
An insurance company is not liable to pay compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act if the policy has been cancelled before the accident and the insured has been informed about the cancellati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Insurance Company is primarily liable to pay compensation to the workmen under the Workmen Compensation Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
