Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
K.MANMADHA RAO
Siddegowda S/o Puttegowda – Appellant
Versus
M. Shantha W/o Mohanraje Urs Major – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
1. The present appeal is filed by the claimant under Section 30 (1) of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as "the ECA Act" for short) against the judgment and award dated 22.03.2019 in No.09/2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Arkalgud (hereinafter referred to as "the Commissioner") for fastening the liability of respondent No.1 and seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Commissioner.
2. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as follows:
The appellant/claimant is the father of deceased Lokesh who met with a fatal accident on 08.04.2010 at about 5:30 am near Chikkodanahalli Gate while working as a driver of a canter vehicle bearing Registration No.KA-09 B-1359 belonging to respondent No.1. The deceased, who was hale and healthy prior to the accident, was employed under respondent No.1 on a monthly salary of Rs.7,500/- with a daily batta of Rs.50/-. The accident occurred during the course and out of employment, resulting in his death. Consequently, the appellant and his wife filed Claim Petition No. ECA .9/2014 seeking compensation of Rs.12,00,000/- with interest at 12% per annum agains
An employer may be held vicariously liable when an employee operates a vehicle without a valid license, negating insurer liability in case of substantive policy breach.
The insurance company is not liable to indemnify for compensation under the Employees Compensation Act when the driver does not possess a valid driving license, as this constitutes a breach of policy....
The insurance company is not liable for compensation if the driver lacked a valid driving licence at the time of the accident.
Employers must ensure employees hold valid driving licenses; failure results in insurer's liability being voided under policy conditions.
Owner solely liable for workmen's compensation when permitting LMV-licensed driver without valid HMV licence to operate heavy vehicle, absolving insurer due to attributable policy breach; appeal dism....
The validity of the driving license is a consideration under a contract of insurance, and the insurer can raise the issue in the proceedings under the Employees Compensation Act.
Compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act is due immediately upon the accident, with interest applicable from that date, contingent on proper adherence to insurance and licensing conditions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the burden of proof on the Insurance Company to establish that the deceased did not possess a valid driving licence and the application of the prin....
: scheme of the Act of 1923 is that when ever, a workman gets injured during the course of his employment, his employer is to pay the compensation. There is no doubt that the respondent/driver sustai....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
