Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CHITTARANJAN DASH
Sushanta Mohapatra – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and initiation of case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding criminal proceedings (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial observations on civil vs. criminal nature (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. quashing of unduly taken cognizance (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
CHITTARANJAN DASH, J.
1. By means of this application, the Petitioners seek to quash the order dated 08.01.2021 passed by the learned SDJM, Berhampur, Berhampur in 1CC Case No.286 of 2020 arising out of 1CC Case No.388 of 2019 corresponding to GR Case No.1779 of 2019 wherein the learned court took cognizance of the offence under Sections 417 /420/34 of the IPC implicating them.
2. The background facts of the case are that the Informant- Opposite Party No.2, namely Pravash Chandra Mohanty, lodged a written report before Baidyanathpur Police Station, Berhampur, which was registered as Baidyanathpur P.S. Case No.264 of 2019 under Section 294 /341/325/500/354/417/420/506/34 of the IPC. Upon registration of the said FIR, investigation was taken up by the police. However, the investigating agency, having found no substance in the allegations, submitted the Final Report attributing the accusations to be based on mistake of fact.
Subseque
Disputes over repayment of money in family arrangements are civil matters and do not constitute criminal offences under IPC sections regarding cheating and deception.
Criminal proceedings cannot proceed where allegations only constitute a civil dispute without intent to cheat.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that for an act to constitute an offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code, there must be fraudulent or dishonest inducement, and the absence ....
Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC do not permit quashing proceedings when prima facie evidence of a crime is present, mandating a trial to ascertain truth.
The court found that a civil dispute may constitute a criminal offence under S.420 IPC if fraudulent intent is present, and the mere existence of a civil remedy does not warrant quashing criminal pro....
A mere breach of contract does not amount to cheating under Section 420 IPC unless there is evidence of dishonest intention from the inception of the transaction.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of essential ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 420 of the IPC and the significance of final judgments in determ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
