Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CHITTARANJAN DASH
Sukanta Kumar Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of complaint and investigation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of cognizance. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal implications of protest petition and cognizance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. criteria for discharge application. (Para 9) |
| 5. conclusion and order on the application. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsels for both the parties.
3. The background facts of the case are that Bansidhar Pradhan, the Opposite Party No.2 lodged a report with the IIC, Chhendipada P.S. on 16.04.2021 alleging some irregularities in the functioning of the institution and misappropriation of the fund of the trust i.e. Kalinga Institute of Mining Engineering and Technology (KIMET), a diploma institute. The said report was treated as FIR and Chhendipada P.S. Case No.215 of 2021 was registered and the investigation commenced. In course of the investigation, the investigating agency found no supporting evidence in respect to the allegations and submitted the closure report (F.R) holding the allegations to be a mistake of fact vide Chhendipada P.S. F.F. No. 548 dated 30.11.2011 and notice was served on the Complainant along with the copy of the report. Pursuant to the closure o
A Protest Petition against a closure report can be treated as a complaint if it meets the necessary requirements, allowing a magistrate to take cognizance even after a final report is submitted.
A Protest Petition can be treated as a complaint if it meets specific requirements; however, a Magistrate's direct cognizance after a closure report is procedurally irregular and must follow correct ....
A magistrate must provide an opportunity to the accused before taking cognizance of an offence, as mandated by Section 223 of BNS-2023, highlighting the limitation on the magistrate's authority in re....
The acceptance of a final report does not prevent a Magistrate from taking cognizance of a complaint based on a protest petition if supported by sufficient evidence.
Right of Complainant to file petition under Section 200 Cr.P.C. is not taken away even if Magistrate concerned does not direct that such a Protest Petition be treated as a complaint.
Point of law: Cheating – Cognizance of offence - Once the learned Magistrate proceeded to record the sworn statement on the basis of the protest petition that itself is taking of the cognizance
A Magistrate cannot take cognizance of the same offence multiple times once it has been committed to the Sessions Court, affirming that further cognizance without proper cause is legally impermissibl....
Cognizance of offences cannot be revisited after an initial order, unless new evidence emerges, upholding the procedural integrity of prior judicial findings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
