SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 723

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C. BEHERA
Utkal Builders Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : D. Mohapatra, P.K. Singhdeo
For the Respondent: Gyanalok Mohanty

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for refund based on e-stamp certificate purchase. (Para 1)
2. refusal based on limitation grounds. (Para 3)
3. legal principles regarding technical grounds for refund denial. (Para 4)
4. state cannot deny legitimate claims solely on delay. (Para 5)
5. court's decision to quash the collector's order and allow refund. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the Letter No.5094 dated 23.04.2024 (Annexure-4) issued by the Collector, Khurda (Opposite Party No.3) through its Assistant Collector (Opposite Party No.5) refusing to refund Rs.2,14,442/- (Rupees two lakhs fourteen thousand four hundred forty-two) equal to the value of the e-Stamp Certificate bearing No.IN-ODO6003535013718V on the ground of limitation assigning the reasons that, “the petitioner had purchased e-Stamp Certificate bearing IN-ODO6003535013718V on dated 10.04.2023, but, he (petitioner) had applied for the refund of the equal amount of the said e-stamp certificate on dated 31.01.2024 for its non-utilization, which is after the expiry of its limitation pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top