SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 801

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C. BEHERA
Jagannath Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Khordha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : T.K. Sahoo
For the Respondent: Gyanalok Mohanty

Table of Content
1. challenge to refund process and rejection (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. judicial consideration of age-related challenges (Para 6 , 7)
3. importance of practical justice over technicalities (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. writ petition allowed; order quashed (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. finality and disposal of the writ petition (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the Letter No.9550 dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure-1) issued by the Collector, Khordha (Opposite Party No.1) through its Deputy Collector (Revenue).

3. As per the advice of the Opposite Party No.2 (Sub- registrar, Khordha), the petitioner applied before the Collector, Khordha (Opposite Party No.1) through his son praying for refund of money, i.e., cash of Rs.1,44,200/- (rupees one lakh forty-four thousand two hundred) in respect of his un-utilized stamp duties.

5. On being dissatisfied with the aforesaid Letter No.9550 dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure-1) concerning the rejection of the application of the petitioner for the refund cash of Rs.1,44,200/-(rupees one lakh forty-four thousand two hundred),

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top