SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 724

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA
Niranjan Dhal – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.S. Chaini, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr.G.N.Rout, Mr.S.Nay

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim based on non-compliance of natural justice. (Para 1 , 2)
2. examining the validity of the impugned order. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's analysis and application of legal principles. (Para 5)
4. final decisions and directives by the court. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

Judgment :

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the impugned order dated 13.08.2024 (Annexure-5) passed in Mutation Appeal No.62 of 2024 by the Sub-Collector, Bhadrak (O.P No.3) on the ground of non-compliance of the principles of natural justice.

For which, the Petitioner filed this writ petition against the O.P. No.6 and others praying for quashing the impugned order dated 13.08.2024 (Annexure-5) passed in that Mutation Appeal No.62 of 2024 by the Sub-Collector, Bhadrak (O.P No.3).

4. Nowhere, in the impugned order dated 13.08.2024 (Annexure- 5) passed in Mutation Appeal No.62 of 2024 by the Sub-Collector, Bhadrak (O.P No.3), it has been indicated/reflected about the impleadment of the Petitioner as a Party in that Mutation Appeal, though the R.o.R. of the case land was in the name of the Petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top