SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 808

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Arata Behera – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Pabitra Kumar Behera
For the Respondent: S. Nayak

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed challenging tahasildar's order. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. natural justice violations render order illegal. (Para 5)
3. court finds merit in the petition. (Para 6 , 7)
4. writ petition allowed; order quashed and remanded. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the final order dated 30.05.2025 passed in Mutation Case No.2197 of 2025 by the Tahasildar, Odagaon (Opp. Party No.3).

3. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition which prompted the petitioner for filing of the same is that, the petitioner had filed a Mutation Case vide Mutation Case No.2197 of 2025 before the Tahasildar, Odagaon (Opp. Party No.3) praying for Mutation of the properties to his name covered under a unregistered Will, but as per order dated 30.05.2025, the Tahasildar, Odagaon (Opp. Party No.3) dropped that Mutation Case of the petitioner on the ground of absence of the petitioner on that day.

5. It appears from the impugned order dated 30.05.2025 (Annexure-1) that, the previous date of Mutation Case No.2197/2025 was on 15.05.2025. In the order dated 15.05.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top