SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 742

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
G. SATAPATHY
Rajeev Lugun @ Topno – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.K. Sahoo
For the Respondent: P. Satpathy

Table of Content
1. bail application for gang rape charges. (Para 1)
2. arguments on default bail due to missing report. (Para 2)
3. court's analysis on accusations and default bail. (Para 3)
4. legal precedents on default bail and charge sheets. (Para 4 , 5)
5. court's explanation on statutory bail rights. (Para 6)
6. conclusion on charge sheet completeness. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

1. This is bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Birmitrapur P.S. Case No.177 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. Case No.151/11 of 2024 pending in the file of learned Ad-hoc ADJ (FTSC) POCSO, Rourkela, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 376(D)/ 376(2)(1)/114 of IPC, on the main allegation of committing Gang Rape upon the victim.

2.1. On the other hand, Mr. P. Satpathy, however, opposes such plea of the petitioner by stating that merely because chemical examination report has not yet been filed, it cannot be construed that the charge sheet is incomplete and the petitioner is entitled to default bail. Mr. Satpathy, accordingly, prays to reject the bail application of the petitioner.

1. we clarify that the order shall not preclude any trial Court or, as the case m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top