SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 755

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
G. SATAPATHY
G. Debendra Rao – Appellant
Versus
G. Puspa Prabha Rao – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.P.B. Bahali
For the Respondent: A. Pradhan

Table of Content
1. overview of marriage and maintenance claim. (Para 1 , 2)
2. family court's initial findings on maintenance. (Para 3 , 5)
3. arguments related to the entitlement of maintenance. (Para 4)
4. legal obligations of a father regarding maintaining unmarried daughter. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. analysis of legal precedents on maintenance. (Para 9 , 10)
6. final judgment and confirmation of maintenance order. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

1. In the instant revision, the petitioner-husband seeks to challenge the impugned order dated 23.12.2019 passed in CMC No. 52-734 of 2012-16 by which the learned Judge Family Court, Bargarh has allowed the petition filed U/s. 125 of CrPC of OP-wife and daughter for maintenance @ Rs.5,000/- each per month; total Rs.10,000/- w.e.f. 06.03.2012.

While the matter stood thus, the present OPs filed a petition U/s. 125 of CrPC against the revision-petitioner for grant of maintenance and in such petition, the present OPs have averred that the revision-petitioner is an Advocate and earns Rs.20,000/- per month, out of his profession and he also earns Rs.1,00,000/- per month from his Hero Honda showroom and Rs.50,000/- per month from house rent.

3. After having consid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top