IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P. ROUTRAY
Gouri Dwibedy – Appellant
Versus
Nagendra Kumari Acharya @ Dwibedy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of amendment request based on procedural grounds. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for justification of amendments and due diligence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. analysis of implications of amendment on case nature. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal framework regarding amendments in pleadings. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court's order confirming lower court's decision. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Ms. S.S. Deo, learned Advocate for the Petitioners, Mr. P. Dash, learned Advocate for the Opposite Party No.2 and Mr. P.K. Satapathy, learned Advocate for Opposite Parties 3, 4, 5(a) to 5(g).
3. Present Petitioners being the Plaintiffs filed T.S. No.58 of 2002 on 13th June 2002. During the year 2008, they amended the plaint with the prayer as follows:-
(a) Plaintiffs' title in respect of the Schedule-A properties be declared as they have acquired exclusive title over the same on the basis of partition held in the year 1964.
(c) the cost of the suit may be decreed against the defendants.
4. The suit was proceeded and the parties adduced their respective evidences. It is now posted for argument. While the matter stood thus, the Plaintiffs seek for amendment to the plaint and the sche
State Bank of Hyderabad vs. Town Municipal Council
Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Sanjeev Builders Private Limited and another
Amendments to pleadings are permissible to clarify disputes provided they do not alter the case's nature or introduce new causes of action; otherwise, they may lead to a de novo trial.
(1) Amendment of plaint – At stage of amendment, merits or correctness of plea sought to be added is not required to be gone into.(2) Amendment of plaint – Partition suit – Mere delay in filing petit....
Amendments to pleadings in partition suits should be liberally allowed to ensure justice and avoid multiplicity of proceedings, without assessing the merits of the amendment at the initial stage.
Amendments to pleadings should be allowed if necessary for determining the real questions in controversy, provided they do not change the nature of the suit or cause prejudice.
The court upheld the ruling that amendments to pleadings are permissible to facilitate just adjudication without injustice, reaffirming established principles governing such applications under the Co....
Amendments to pleadings are essential for effective adjudication and should be allowed unless they change the nature of the suit or cause irreparable prejudice to the other party.
An amendment to pleadings should be allowed if it is necessary for proper adjudication, bona fide, does not cause irreparable prejudice, avoids injustice or multiple litigation, does not change the n....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.