IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
Rabindra Kumar Patra S/o Kedarnath Patra – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government of Odisha Forest and Environment Department – Respondent
WPC (OA) No. 1225 of 2017
Decided On : 13-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge to seniority order. (Para 1) |
| 2. description of the factual history and changes in recruitment rules. (Para 2) |
| 3. counter-affidavit clarifying the gradation process. (Para 3) |
| 4. claim of petitioners regarding wrongful seniority. (Para 4) |
| 5. hearing of the petition. (Para 5) |
| 6. arguments and legal precedent from petitioner. (Para 6) |
| 7. response from the private opposite parties. (Para 7) |
| 8. further clarification on positions of opposite parties. (Para 8) |
| 9. analysis of rehabilitation assistance scheme (ra rules). (Para 9) |
| 10. the court's review of seniority claims. (Para 10) |
| 11. legal principles for determining seniority. (Para 11) |
| 12. court's final reasoning and dismissal of the petition. (Para 12) |
| 13. conclusion of the judgment. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
1. Questioning the propriety and legality of decision vide Forest and Environment Department Letter No.FE-FE3- 0165-2017—7420/F&E, dated 13.04.2017 (Annexure-6) fixing seniority of Foresters appointed under the provisions of the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 (for short "RA Rules") from the date of their joining in the Training or in the Division, whichever is earlier, for their entitlement to get all promotional as also pecuniary benefits, the petitioner had approached the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar by way of filing Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which was registered as O.A. No.1225 of 2017, with a prayer to direct the opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 to rectify not only the Gradation/Seniority List-cum-Disposition List of Foresters vide Memo No.20855/2F(NG)- 184/2015, dated 08.11.2016 (Annexure-4) but also the Revised Gradation List of Foresters vide Memo No.14814/2F(NG)-53/2017, dated 24.06.2017 (Annexure-7) issued from the State Forest Headquarters, Odisha, Office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests.
1.1. In the Original Application the petitioners prayed for grant of following relief(s):
“(a) To quash the order under Annexure-6 and direct the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to correct Annexures-4 and 7 by placing the applicants along with other similarly situated Foresters above the Respondents in the interest of justice;
(b) Pass any other order /orders as deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
1.2. After abolition of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal by virtue of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) Notification F. No. A-11014/10/2015-AT [G.S.R.552(E).], dated 2nd August, 2019), the said case having been transferred to this Court, O.A. No. 1225 of 2017 has been re-registered as WPC (OA) No.1225 of 2017.
Facts:
2. All the petitioners/applicants initially entered into Government service as Village Forest Workers ("VFW" for short) during the period from 1984 to 1990. Government of Odisha in Forest and Environment Department in exercise of power conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of Constitution of India amended the Odisha Sub-ordinate Forest Service (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Service Foresters) Rules, 1998 by virtue of the Odisha Sub-ordinate Forest Service (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Service Foresters) Amendment Rules, 2009 vide Notification No.2F(F)-40/04— 2330/F&E, dated 10.02.2009. [After amendment in 2009, the provisions of Rule 12 of the Odisha Sub-ordinate Forest Service (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Foresters) Rules, 1998 stand thus: “*[4. Method of Recruitment.— Recruitment to the post of Foresters in the Division Office shall be made by the Selection Board: (a) by way of redesignation and merger of the existing Cadre of Village Forest Wokers (VFWs) as one-time arrangement and the VFWs so merged shall not be treated as direct recruits or promotees to the Cadre of Foresters; and (b) After such merger as is referred to in Clause (a)— (i) by direct recruitment to the extent of 50% through competitive examinatio
Prafulla Kumar Swain Vs. Prakash Chandra Misra
Maloon Lawrence Cecil D’Souza Vs. Union of India
P.S. Sadasivaswamy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Ashok Ram Parhad Vs. State of Maharashtra
V. Vincent Velankanni Vs. Union of India
Seniority of foresters appointed under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme is determined from training date, upholding compliance with existing rules and rejecting retrospective claims based on merger a....
The court established that training periods for direct recruits are not counted as service until successful completion, impacting seniority rights.
Claims regarding seniority must be raised promptly; failure to do so can lead to dismissal based on delay and laches.
Seniority in service is a statutory right determined by established merit lists, with waiting list candidates lacking rights to precedence over those appointed from the main list.
The date of appointment for determining seniority in a substantive post should be the date of actual appointment post-training, not the date of initial recruitment as an Apprentice.
Retrospective promotion cannot be granted to an employee from a date when the employee was not borne in the cadre. Sub-rule (3) of Rule 8 of the 2002 Rules was found inapplicable to determine the int....
The court upheld that seniority must be determined based on recruitment batch and performance in training, emphasizing timely challenges to promotions are essential to maintain stability in service r....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.