SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 128

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Rajkishore Biswal – Appellant
Versus
Sikhar Behera – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Pronoy Mohanty, Adv.

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction of second appeal under cpc (Para 1 , 2)
2. tenancy and land possession claims (Para 3 , 4)
3. trial court's findings and appellate review (Para 5 , 7)
4. legal implications of unregistered agreements (Para 6 , 8)
5. final orders and directions regarding possession (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

1. The Appellants, by filing this Appeal under Section-100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the Code’), have assailed the judgment and decree dated 22nd July 2022 and 5th August 2022 respectively passed by the learned District Judge, Nayagarh in R.F.A. No.06 of 2019.

The suit having been dismissed, the Respondents as the unsuccessful Plaintiffs had carried Appeal under section-96 of the Code. The First Appeal has been allowed in part directing the Appellants (Defendants) to vacate the suit land within a month failing which the possession would stand recovered from them in favour of the Respondents (Plaintiffs) following due process of law. These Appellants, therefore, being the aggrieved the Defendants having suffered from the judgment and decree passed by the Frist Appellate Court have filed this Second Appeal.

3. Plaintiffs Case: -

4. The Defendants by fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top