SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Rajkishore Sahoo – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : D.R. Bhokta
For the Respondents: M. Acharya, B. Panigrahi

Table of Content
1. grounds for appeal based on compensation assessment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court identified issues regarding market value of land. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments against the lower court's assessment of compensation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. respondent's stance and support for higher compensation. (Para 9 , 10)
5. court's analysis of compensation valuation methods. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
6. decision upheld the lower court's compensation order. (Para 16)
7. conclusion and order to implement the judgment. (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

1. This Appeal has been preferred against the Judgment dated 13.02.2018 passed in L.A. Misc. Case No.69 of 2013 by the Senior Civil Judge, Nayagarh, vide which the Court below allowed the claim of the Claimant (Respondent No.1 in the present Appeal) and ordered for higher compensation.

3. As is revealed from the L.C.R, after giving opportunities to the parties to have their say and lead evidence, the Court below framed the following issues:-

ii) To what relief the Claimant/Petitioner is entitled for?

5. The Appeal has been preferred basically on the grounds that, the referral Court has misdirected himself in appreciating the materials available on record

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top