Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Prasanta Devi Padhi – Appellant
Versus
Asish Kumar Padhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding permanent alimony claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on statutory provisions. (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. interpretation of alimony laws and courts' powers. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. conclusion allowing the appeal. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT :
D. Dash, J.
The Appellant, by filing this Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, ‘the Code’), has assailed the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Titilagarh, Bolangir, in R.F.A. No.21 of 2015.
The Respondent (husband) as the Petitioner had filed an application under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the H.M Act’) arraigning the Appellant (wife) as the Respondent therein, praying for a decree for dissolution of their marriage. The said application stood numbered as C. S. No.32 of 2011 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Titilagarh. The Trial Court decreed the suit and in dissolving the marriage between the parties directed the Respondent (husband) to pay a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- to the Appellant (wife) as permanent alimony. The Respondent (husband) being aggrieved by the said judgment and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
