Prasanta Devi Padhi VS Asish Kumar Padhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

D. DASH
Prasanta Devi Padhi – Appellant
Versus
Asish Kumar Padhi – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. D.K. Sahoo-1, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. T.K. Sahu, Advocate

JUDGMENT

D. Dash, J.—The Appellant, by filing this Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, ‘the Code’), has assailed the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Titilagarh, Bolangir, in R.F.A. No.21 of 2015.

The Respondent (husband) as the Petitioner had filed an application under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the H.M Act’) arraigning the Appellant (wife) as the Respondent therein, praying for a decree for dissolution of their marriage. The said application stood numbered as C. S. No.32 of 2011 in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Titilagarh. The Trial Court decreed the suit and in dissolving the marriage between the parties directed the Respondent (husband) to pay a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- to the Appellant (wife) as permanent alimony. The Respondent (husband) being aggrieved by the said judgment and decree passed in the suit, carried an Appeal under section 28 the H.M Act. The First Appellate Court in that Appeal filed by the Respondent (husband) challenging the grant of permanent alimony to the Appellant (wife) has set aside the said order of the Trial Court as to the direction for payment of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document