SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 68

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
HARISH TANDON, CJ., MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, J.
Alone Trust – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others – Respondent
W.P.(C) No.33077 of 2024
Decided on : 05-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P.K. Dutta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. P.K. Parhi, Deputy Solicitor General of India Mr. J.B. Mohanty, Central Government Counsel Mr. Debashis Tripathy, Addl. Govt. Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) Mr. Subir Palit, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae)

The State has a statutory duty to prevent the misuse of the State Emblem, necessitating enforcement of existing laws and public education to uphold national integrity.

Headnote:(A) Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950; State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005 - Misuse of the State Emblem; public interest litigation filed to address the improper use of the Emblem, which continues despite existing laws - Petitioner sought mandamus for enforcement and awareness of the proper use of the Emblem. (Paras 1-2, 14-17)

(B) Statutory Obligations - The State acknowledged its responsibility to prevent misuse of the Emblem and admitted existing mistakes; ordered corrective measures and public awareness initiatives. (Paras 15-21)

(C) Judicial Directives - The court directed authorities to implement existing laws effectively and suggested creating a State Level Task Force for monitoring compliance and awareness. (Paras 19-21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation addressing improper use of the State Emblem, including its absence during a significant public event. (Paras 12-14)

Findings of Court:
A writ of mandamus was issued directing authorities to comply with the statutory provisions on Emblem usage and promote awareness. (Paras 19-24)

Issues: The main issues were the proper enforcement of laws regarding the Emblem's usage and the need for public education about its significance. (Paras 18-21)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the State's role in safeguarding the Emblem's integrity and mandated actions to prevent misuse and improve public awareness. (Paras 8-9, 20)

Result: The petition was disposed of with numerous directives for compliance and awareness initiatives.

Table of Content
1. significance of national symbols (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. legislation on emblem use (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. awareness and misuse of emblem (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court's observations and recommendations (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. conclusions and directions (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

HARISH TANDON, CJ.

1. On the advent of human civilization taking a paradigm shift from a community-based power to monarchy and taking shape in the form of a country, the Symbol, Flag, and/or Emblem were used symbolizing honour, right and the authority exercised to achieve the object of justice, ethos behind the purity of the administration and above all, inculcating the sense of values towards the motherland. It not only encompasses the honour and pride to any nation but also depicts its historical, cultural and moral values.

2. The National Symbol or the Emblem adopted by the nation percolates a sense of responsibilities and core values of life which at times, is distinct from the other nations within the globe. Preservation of the core cultural, ethical and moral values and its dissemination through the Symbol, Flag and Emblem is aimed not only to unite the people of the country but to be reminded of the basic values of life.

3. After the independence achieved by the people of our country from the colonial rule, the first and foremost task, which was felt inevitable to represent the sovereign republic identity and its values in adopting the National Flag, National Anthem and also the National Emblem. It was proposed in the Constituent Assembly that the National Emblem should be inspired from the mode of rule and the governance embraced by the capital of Ashoka, which illuminates and/or resolute the sovereignty, unity and ancient civilization and its heritage.

4. Before the adoption of the Constitution of India and after the independence achieved from the British colonial rule on 15th August, 1947, the dominion of India adopted the State Emblem through a press communique dated 29th December, 1947 to be published or broadcast on 30th December, 1947 which should consist of the Sarnath Lion Capital of king Ashoka with the lions standing on an abacus having Dharma Chakra in the center, a bull on the right and horse on the left and the outlines of the Dharma Chakra on extreme right and left with further stipulation that a suitable motto will be included in due course as soon as one has been decided upon. Subsequently, the State Emblem representing the Lion Capital of king Ashoka with motto “Satyameva Jayate” in Devanagari was adopted as a State Emblem of India on 26th January, 1950.

5. Immediately after the adoption of the Constitution of India to take effect from 26th January, 1950, in contemporaneous period of time, the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 was promulgated, tracing the source of powers from the residuary Article 97 of List-I, defining the word "Emblem" to mean any Emblem, Seal, Flag and Insignia, the coat of arms or pictorial representation as specified in the schedule appended thereto.

6. The said Act contains an exhaustive provision, including the prohibition of improper use of the Emblems and Names, yet there appears a continuous improper use thereof in diversified fields, including in trade and commerce. The Constitution Bench of the apex Court in M/s. Sable Waghire & Company v. The Union of India, reported in (1975) 1 SCC 763, though was considering the pictorial representation and the words, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj used as a registered trademark by the said company engaged in a business of manufacturing, marketing and selling bidis across the country, the challenge was made by the said company to the constitutional validity of the said Act and its vires and in pursuit of addressing such issues, the Constitution Bench succinctly recapitulated the object and purpose, underlining the promulgation of the said act in the following:

15. Let us, therefore, have a background of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top