Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI
Lingaraj Nayak (dead) – Appellant
Versus
Udhava Charan Nayak – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of probate proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellants' arguments against the grant of probate. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on limitation and validity of the will. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding timing of probate application. (Para 11 , 12 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. conclusion affirming the lower court's decision. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
1. In this appeal, the appellants are challenging the order dated 27.12.2018 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bhubaneswar in C.S. No.3/2016(T) arising out of Test Case No.14/2007.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE :
(i) The Appellant No.1 was the adopted son of Late Krushna Chandra Nayak, whereas the Respondent is his nephew.
(iii) The Appellant No.1 had initiated probate proceedings vide TEST Case No.14 of 2007, before the District Judge, Khurda, Bhubaneswar. However, after a lapse of five years, he filed a petition seeking to withdraw the said probate proceeding.
(v) Meanwhile, the Respondent filed a petition seeking transposition as a petitioner in the probate proceedings, contending that the Will was in favor of both parties, and therefore, prob
The right to apply for probate is continuous and not strictly bound by a time limit, provided the execution and attestation of the will are established following legal requirements.
A holographic Will is presumed valid unless strong evidence is presented to the contrary. Delays in seeking letters of administration do not invalidate the Will if the right to apply arises from lega....
The right to apply for probate is continuous, and the burden of proof lies on the propounder to establish the Will's validity and genuineness, which was satisfied in this case.
Probate of a Will requires strict compliance with statutory formalities, including attestation by witnesses; failure to provide adequate proof leads to dismissal of the application.
The court found that the application for probate was barred by limitation, and the alleged Will was not duly executed, failing to meet statutory requirements.
Important Point : A will can be proved through secondary evidence if the original is lost, and Letters of Administration can be granted when no executor is appointed.
The absence of an original Will does not invalidate its probate if secondary evidence sufficiently proves its execution and the delay in application is justified.
A registered WILL that is over 30 years old carries a presumption of due execution, and requirements around attesting witnesses may not be fatal if the document is adequately proved otherwise.
The court affirmed that the execution of a Will must comply with statutory requirements, and the burden of proof lies on those alleging its invalidity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
