Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BISWANATH RATH
Bhuban Dombo @ Bhuban Harijan – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nabarangpur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to orders under orissa land reforms act. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments on application of section 23-a. (Para 2) |
| 3. court analysis on prospective nature of section 23-a. (Para 3) |
| 4. writ petition is granted, impugned orders declared bad. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT :
BISWANATH RATH, J.
This writ petition involves a challenge to the orders at Annexures- 2, 3 and 4 respectively passed by the competent authorities under the provision of the ORISSA LAND REFORMS ACT .
2. Undisputedly the writ petition faces a challenge to confirming order by all the three forums but enumerated on a petition involving Section 23-A of the ORISSA LAND REFORMS ACT . In course of hearing, question arose looking to the sale transaction taking place on 19.06.1969 vide Registered Sale Deed No. 1268 of 1969 if a proceeding under Section 23-A of the ORISSA LAND REFORMS ACT could have been initiated in the year 2004 vide O.L.R. Case No.1 of 2004. After hearing the submissions of respective counsel, this Court finds the provision at Section 23-A of the ORISSA LAND REFORMS ACT restricts a transaction of scheduled property inserted by Orissa Act No.44 of 1976 and a submission is made that for the prospective natu
Section 23-A of the Orissa Land Reforms Act is prospective, and proceedings initiated concerning pre-enactment transactions are not maintainable.
Amendments to legislation cannot apply retrospectively, emphasizing the importance of limitation periods in lease cases.
The legal principle established is that the settlement of land must have the necessary sanction as required by relevant acts, and the revisional jurisdiction under the OEA Act can be exercised even a....
Sale deeds executed without permission under Section 22 of the OLR Act are void ab initio, and possession claimed based on such deeds cannot establish title through adverse possession.
The Odisha Land Reforms Act applies to urban homestead lands, and prior permission is required for their transfer, upholding the registering authority's jurisdiction to refuse registration for lack o....
The resumption of land under Section 3-B cannot be solely based on observations of land lying fallow; substantial evidence of actual non-use for its intended purpose is required.
The duty of the authorities under the Regulations to prevent exploitation of members of Scheduled Tribes while ensuring that bona fide purchasers are not unnecessarily harassed or dragged into litiga....
The principle of res judicata prevents re-litigation of previously settled land ownership disputes, especially against procedural lapses, reaffirming established ownership under the Orissa Estates Ab....
The transfer of land mortgaged to a Scheduled Bank is exempt from restrictions under Section 22 of the OLR Act, allowing the Petitioner to effectuate a valid mutation as auction purchaser.
Civil courts retain jurisdiction to adjudicate on matters showing procedural irregularities in revenue court decisions, even if some claims are governed by the OLR Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
