Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Rajesh Behera – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments of the petitioner and state. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. insufficient evidence linking petitioner to death. (Para 6 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. analysis of culpable homicide standards. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. evaluation of other charges against petitioner. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. court's decision to quash proceedings. (Para 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.
The petitioner, in the present application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeks quashment of the criminal proceedings instituted against him in C.T. Case No.1383 of 2021 of the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Chandikhole under Sections 287 /304/420/379/34 IPC , Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act 1957, Sections 3 and 4 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
2. The facts of the case are that one Dukhina Purty lodged FIR in Jenapur police station on 24.08.2021 stating therein, that has father, Dilip Purty, while returning home on 23.08.2021 from the hillock fell down in a ditch at about 3.00 P.M. He was taken to Dharmasala dispensary where the doctor declared him dead. In course of inve
Criminal charges require direct evidence linking the accused to the act causing death; mere participation in illegal activity is insufficient for liability without overt acts.
Criminal liability under IPC for negligence requires direct causation and gross negligence must be established; absence of presence at the incident absolves the petitioner of responsibility.
Concurrent prosecutions under the IPC and Factories Act for the same incident are permissible as the laws address different legal elements and liabilities.
Point of law : A court exercising its inherent jurisdiction must examine if on their face, the averments made in the complaint constitute the ingredients necessary for the offence.
(1) Discharge of accused – By its very nature, discharge is at a higher pedestal than acquittal – Acquittal is at end of trial process, may be for a technicality or on benefit of doubt or prosecution....
Point of Law : High Court may exercise the powers under Section 226 of Constitution or the inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of Court or otherwise to secure the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
