SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 309

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY
Gayatree Pattnaik – Appellant
Versus
Arundhati Sahoo – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. D.C. Dey, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S.Roy, Advocate

ORDER :

B. P. ROUTRAY

1. The matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. Heard Mr.Dey, learned counsel for the claimant- Appellant and Mr.Roy, learned counsel for Insurer-Respondent No.1.

3. Present appeal by the claimant is directed against the judgment dated 16th April, 2022 of the 2nd Addl. District Judge- cum-3rd MACT, Cuttack, in M.A.C. Case No.572 of 2015, wherein compensation to the tune of Rs.30,12,960/- has been granted along with interest @6% per annum with effect from the date of filing of the claim application on account of injuries sustained by the claimant in the motor vehicular accident on 16th June, 2015.

4. The Insurer-Respondent No.2 has also filed cross- appeal challenging the impugned judgment.

5. The injured-claimant is a minor girl and at the time of accident she was only six months old. She sustained with permanent disability to the extent of 90%, i.e. Post Trauma Myelopathy with Paraplegia. The Tribunal granted total compensation of Rs.30,12,960/- on the following counts:

Sl.No.HeadsAmount
(i)Expenses relating to medical expensesRs.3,00,000/-
(ii)Compensation on account of future treatmentRs.3,00,000/-
(iii)Attendant chargesRs.30,000/-
(iv)Pain, suffering, loss of ameni

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top