Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI
Ayusmanta Sarangi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of prosecution's case. (Para 2) |
| 2. revisionist's arguments for innocence. (Para 3) |
| 3. discussion on law of charge and discharge. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis on the role of the principal. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. absence of evidence leads to discharge. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 6. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 34 , 37 , 39) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has filed this criminal revision challenging the order dated 17.10.2023 passed by the Assistant Sessions Judge-Cum-Judge (Special) for Womens Court, Bargarh in CT No.84/23 rejecting discharge petition under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner for alleged commission of offence under Section(s) 294/306/34 of IPC .
2. The prosecution’s case can be summarized as follows :
(ii). Subsequently, on 20.02.2019, a meeting was convened by the Ayusmanta Sarangi (“the Petitioner”)/ the Principal of Dadhibaman College, to address the issue, during which the boys were cautioned, though they denied any involvement in the theft. Consequently, it was decided that their respective guardians would be summoned to the college. Meanwhile, the deceased’s roommates, Pitabash and Pritam, allegedly frightened him by suggest
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
