Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY
Rabindranath Dwibedi – Appellant
Versus
Satyabhama Dei – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the consolidation commissioner's order. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. nature of the disputed registered sale deed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments on authority to declare documents voidable. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal distinction between void and voidable documents. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. commissioner's limitations in adjudicating voidable documents. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. final decision to set aside the commissioner's order. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. B.N. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. U.K. Sahoo, learned Additional Standing Counsel for State-Opposite Party Nos.2 to 5 and Mr. S. Sourav on behalf of Mr. S.K. Hota, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.1.
3. Consolidation Revision Case Nos.561 of 2014 and 562 of 2014 were filed by the Petitioner against the order of the Deputy Director. Both the revisions before the Commissioner arose out of two appeals filed by the Petitioner. Initially, two objections were filed before the Consolidation Officer, one by the Petitioner and another by Opposite Party No.1 along with her mother. The Consolidation Officer has allowed the objection filed by Opposite Party No.1 and rejected the objection filed by the Petitioner.
5. Th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
